The article explores the parallels between rising Christian Nationalism in the UK and Islamist extremism, arguing that both movements, rather than canceling each other out, bolster one another. It challenges the notion that accepting one form of religious extremism can protect against another, framing both as threats to democracy and open societies. Figures like Tommy Robinson exploit this dichotomy, misleadingly framing Christian Nationalism as a defense against Islamism.
The article asserts that both movements draw on grievance and alienation, attracting largely disaffected men who seek to impose rigid values. Although both are minority movements in a predominantly secular country, they feed off each other’s existence, using each other as proof of their necessity. Islamist extremism has led to deadly acts of terror, while Christian Nationalism poses a more insidious threat through its closeness to power and influence in institutions.
The article cites the ideologies and tactics of both movements as corrosive to societal norms, drawing parallels with similar movements in Turkey and India. Ultimately, it argues for a society rooted in universal human rights and secularism, emphasizing that a robust democracy ensures no religion has privileged access to power. It calls for unity among people of goodwill across various belief systems to reject tribalism and promote a fair society based on equality and freedom.
