In a recent appearance on MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show, Kamala Harris labeled Donald Trump a “tyrant,” reflecting a growing chorus of Democrats expressing concern over his administration’s attacks on democratic principles. The debate among anti-Trump forces has shifted between advocating a pro-democracy message versus addressing issues of “oligarchy” as highlighted by figures like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC).
Harris diverged from this broader critique, suggesting that the corporate “titans of industry” should unite against Trump, whom she compared to communist dictators. California Governor Gavin Newsom echoed this sentiment, alluding to a Trump deal with Intel and arguing that Trump is embracing a socialist agenda similar to proposals from the left like those of Zohran Mamdani. Newsom insists that Democrats should critique Trump as a “nationalist and socialist” rather than aligning with progressive ideas.
Sanders, meanwhile, supported the Intel deal, asserting that public investment deserves returns for the populace. He has also become a prominent figure rallying against Trump under the “Fighting Oligarchy” banner, drawing significant crowds and support. Similarly, Mamdani’s successful campaign for New York mayor has solidified his standing as a national figure promoting socialist policies to benefit working-class citizens.
The article questions the strategy of Harris and Newsom, suggesting their approach does not resonate with the Democratic base, which shows enthusiasm for the economic equality linked to anti-Trump messaging. A recent poll indicates strong support for the “Fighting Oligarchy” rallies among Democratic voters.
Ultimately, Harris and Newsom’s defense of neoliberal economics appears disconnected from the realities of voter sentiment, suggesting their outdated perspectives may hinder their relevance. The article posits that engaging directly with Trump’s oligarchic ties offers a more coherent and compelling narrative for protecting democracy.
