The article outlines Jared Isaacman’s proposal for a “science-as-a-service” approach for NASA, suggesting that the agency should purchase scientific data from commercial entities instead of launching its own satellites. This idea has led to perceptions of him being labeled as “anti-science” regarding NASA’s missions. In response, Isaacman emphasized his commitment to scientific programs, citing his support for the Chandra X-ray Observatory and his funding of significant scientific missions.
He addresses concerns over recent funding cuts to the Chandra Observatory in a letter to NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, arguing its critical role in advancing X-ray astronomy and the potential negative impact of its defunding. He pleads for the restoration of approximately $70 million annually for Chandra to uphold U.S. leadership in scientific discovery. Isaacman’s involvement in space exploration, including funding expeditions that also support research initiatives, is highlighted to counter accusations of being anti-science.
