The article critiques Boris Johnson’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, attributing 23,000 deaths to his delayed response in imposing lockdowns. During the crisis, he was criticized for prioritizing leisure over leadership while the NHS faced overwhelming challenges. The piece highlights a broader critique of his rightwing supporters, who have historically rejected life-saving measures, embracing an “anti-science” ethos that extends to various public health initiatives.
While Johnson’s government was unable to act effectively during the pandemic, historical examples of skewed media narratives regarding public health are recalled, emphasizing how libertarian ideologies contributed to dangerous policy decisions. The article points out the divided opinions around lockdowns and the financial costs associated with such policies, estimated between £310bn to £410bn.
Despite backlash from lockdown skeptics and rightwing outlets disputing the reported deaths, comparisons are drawn to countries like Norway and Sweden, illustrating the benefits of precautionary measures. The author calls for a serious evaluation of the balance between government intervention and the economic costs, urging deeper consideration of public health and safety in future pandemics while remaining cautious of extreme libertarian views that prioritize individual freedom over collective well-being.
