The article discusses a provocative thought regarding Trump’s $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times. While the author acknowledges the potential harm to democracy if the lawsuit succeeds, they find some dark satisfaction in the idea, prompted by frustrations with the Times’ approach to journalism.
In an interview, Joe Kahn, the Times’ executive editor, emphasized that journalism’s role is to provide impartial coverage without favoring one candidate over another. He contends that democracy requires free and fair elections, implying that voters might choose Trump again, despite the threat his candidacy poses. The author critiques Kahn’s stance, arguing that it trivializes the importance of democracy, equating it with other political issues without recognizing the urgency of defending liberal democracy against authoritarianism.
The article advocates for solidarity among those who support democratic values, even when it means aligning with figures they may disagree with. The author stresses the need to confront threats from figures like Trump collectively, recognizing that the fight against fascism and authoritarianism demands uncomfortable alliances.
Additionally, there is criticism of the current state of political discourse, particularly the “debate me bro” culture exemplified by figures like Charlie Kirk, which undermines meaningful engagement and creates false equivalences in dialogue.
In summary, the piece calls for an introspective approach to support democracy, urging individuals to prioritize solidarity and collective action to resist the rising tide of autocracy and undemocratic practices.
